I find it comforting that Craig was not only able to transcend those criticisms with his performances but also, that he has made Bond into possibly as much of an icon of style and sex-appeal as he’s ever been, not by conforming to the image but simply by being great.Īnton: I remember that line in The Guardian. So, the switch to the “blonde Bond” who, as Peter Bradshaw describes in his review of Spectre in The Guardian, has that “great big handsome-Shrek face with its sweetly bat ears,” was a bit of a shock for people. And he was, as we discussed, a charmer and popular with the ladies. Pierce Brosnan, for all his shortcomings as Bond that we discussed, was actually quite a beloved James Bond. When all we have to go on is how somebody looks and how they align with previous images of the character, it is easy to say, “Hey! That’s different” or “He looks different from ” but having seen the films, people decided that having a good performance was more important that any difference in appearance.Ĭhange is always difficult for fans with deep emotional investment in a series. What happened?Īnders: I think part of what happened, which is a good thing, is that substance trumped appearance. Daniel Craig: His look, character, attitude, and screen presenceĪnton: Before Casino Royale came out, Daniel Craig, the new “blonde Bond,” was derided.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |